[Users Choice]

STATE COLLEGE, Pa., May 11 -- HigherEdJobs, the leading source for jobs and career information in academia, was selected as a winner of the WEDDLE's 2011 User's Choice Awards. Now in their seventh year, WEDDLE's annual User's Choice Awards are the only accolades in the online employment services industry in which actual users -- those who are looking for employment and those who are looking for employees -- are able to vote for the employment sites they think work best.

[Users choice]

DOWNLOAD

"We are very honored to receive the WEDDLE's User's Choice Award," says HigherEdJobs President and Co-Founder, John Ikenberry. "Our mission is to help higher education candidates and employers connect with one another. Receiving an award from our users is further confirmation that we are making a difference to the individuals and institutions we serve."

Executive PerspectiveEd Meyercord, President and CEO, Extreme Networks, Inc."Extreme is privileged to be recognized as a Gartner Customers' Choice for the fourth year in a row. One of the best indicators of our success as a company is the response from end users. Extreme believes that network management should feel effortless, and we are both honored and validated by feedback from customers who say we have made their organizations more capable and competitive by making it easier to get the most out of their network."

Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

Objective: While scholarship has investigated how to provide more healthy food options in choice pantry environments, research has just begun to investigate how pantry users go about making decisions regarding food items when the ability to choose is present. The present analysis sought to investigate the factors prohibiting and inhibiting food decision making in choice pantries from the perspective of frequent pantry users.

Design: Six focus group interviews were conducted with visitors to choice food pantries, to discuss the decision-making process involved in food selection during choice pantry visits. Each was provided a $US 15 remuneration for taking part.

Results: Choice pantry visitors indicated that the motivation to select healthy food items was impacted by both individual and situational influences, similar to retail environments. Just as moment-of-purchase and place-of-purchase factors influence the purchasing of food items in retail environments, situational factors, such as food availability and the 'price' of food items in point values, impacted healthy food selection at choice pantries. However, the stigmatization experienced by those who visit pantries differs quite dramatically from the standard shopping experience.

Conclusions: Choice pantries would benefit from learning more about the psychosocial factors in their own pantries and adapting the environment to the desires of their users, rather than adopting widely disseminated strategies that encourage healthy food choices with little consideration of their unique clientele.

The card-sorting method is great to find out about the categories that make more sense to your users. You can use card-sorting to define the groupings of the functionalities and also the labels for these categories. You should do this early on in your project, before starting any sketching or wireframe.

Time on Site - There is a sweet spot for most websites when it comes to time spent on site. Too little time and the user has likely left without purchasing or registering. Too much time and they may get caught up in information consumption and again fail to make a purchase or register. Just enough time and the majority of users who will make a purchase and register will do so.

As a user experience designer, you have a great ally in the card-sorting method. Keep in mind that you 1) first need to find out who are your users and what they need, 2) then define the functionalities your product and service will offer to meet these needs, and 3) use methods such as card sorting to build the right categorization and labels for these categories.

Developers interested in adopting user choice billing have to follow certain UX guidelines set by Google that detail how to implement the feature in their apps. These guidelines currently require developers to display an information screen and a separate billing choice screen. The information screen only has to be shown to each user the first time they initiate a purchase, but the billing choice screen must be shown before every purchase, the rules state. There are other requirements around when and how to display the screens and how the user interface should appear.

Recently, a discussion has emerged around billing choice within app stores. We welcome this conversation and today we want to share an exciting pilot program we are working on in partnership with Play developers.

In December of 2018 Point of Sale Corner LLC acquired the consumerschoicepos.com (ccpos.com) website and has manged and operated it since then. Point of Sale Corner LLC also manages and operates poscatch.com (the site you are on now) since its launch in 2012. In order for us to maintain the highest level of support for our customers, we have decided to consolidate our services and forward Consumers Choice POS customers to POSCatch.com. Consumers Choice POS customers will still be serviced the same way as previously but now via the POSCatch website.

Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

4.) Gartner Peer Insights content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences with the vendors listed on the platform, should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

5.) Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, express or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

Because Windows on ARM relies upon so many traditional Windows assets, including brand, code, footprint, and experience, the decision to exclude other browsers may also have antitrust implications. If Windows on ARM is simply another version of Windows on new hardware, it also runs afoul of the EC browser choice commitments and seems to represent the very behavior the DOJ-Microsoft settlement sought to prohibit.

Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

The search engine and browser you use should be a personal choice, but right now it's often too complicated to switch away from gatekeeper defaults. So in an open letter to the companies, consumer organizations, and regulators with the power to create effective user choice screens, the CEOs of DuckDuckGo and Ecosia, and Qwant's President published a set of common-sense principles to improve this user experience online. This letter coincides with the final adoption of the EU's Digital Markets Act by the European Parliament this week.

Without strict adherence to both clear rules and principles for fair choice screens and effective switching mechanisms, gatekeeping firms could choose to circumvent their legal obligations. We suggest regulators make clear their enforcement should adhere to the following ten essential principles for fair choice screens and effective switching mechanisms:

Eg. Like Say I have 2 courses, a new user comes up and selects course as a guest, then he signs up and wait for the administrator to give access to the Course.But as an administrator I dont know what the user has selected and what the user's choice of course are?

Later this year, the DAA will release a mobile app, available on Android and iOS devices, that will allow mobile device users to set their preferences for what behavioral ads they want to see, the group announced Thursday. The app will also allow mobile users to opt out of receiving ads based on their interests, with generic ads delivered instead, a DAA spokeswoman said. 2ff7e9595c